javascript - Youtube Player API Difference (Chromeless vs IFrame) - Which is better? -


so have scoured web on information on how embed youtube players actual detailed tutorials seem extremely sparse or non existent. in addition, although there documentation found on google site seems confusing novice on how implement either leads me question. seems there 2 players, iframe player , chromeless player uses swf embed. have gone ahead , provided examples of both:

iframe player(using angular): http://plnkr.co/edit/h5vnlphoaa2n6zsfsj5p?p=preview

chromeless player: http://plnkr.co/edit/epz9uxdz1uiiv4lgb0vw?p=preview

my question is, difference? advantage of using 1 on other? 1 have more backwards compatibility browsers? mobile support? chromeless player seems require less code run of code runs out of box included "swfobject.js".in addition seems chromeless player not work on ios devices due flash requirement. correct?

addendum: can see iframe , chromeless player same besides fact can click on iframe youtube player pause while chromeless player can controlled play/pause controls.

one big benefit using iframes youtube is new window call youtube... , guess what? youtube interpret browser , platform request coming , populate appropriate content iframe can slow loading on older browsers , on mobile devices object/embed not. parameter settings (to tune user experience on site) same. know swf files won't work on ios might need factor development userbase.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PHPMotion implementation - URL based videos (Hosted on separate location) -

c# - Unity IoC Lifetime per HttpRequest for UserStore -

I am trying to solve the error message 'incompatible ranks 0 and 1 in assignment' in a fortran 95 program. -